I didn't take it out the PlayStation, take my keys and scratch it up, break it in half, and piss on it and then re-package it and send it back to Bethesda like some people did. However, the reason I probably didn't hate it like other people, is because all the while I was playing it, I just told myself that it was a spin-off.
A game that was an official "part of the series", but was just something new that they wanted to try, kind of like Tactics but Fallout 3 wasn't as bad as FO:T This is how I feel about the game, and I AM a veteran fallout player. I first played Fallout the first one was my introduction to Fallout in been playing FO for ten years now, never gets old. I cant tell you how much I loved that game. Everyday I would go to bed, literally not being able to wait until tomorrow so I could get out of school and go home and play Fallout.
I loved that game like it was my child figuratively speaking. I am 20 now, and I still enjoy the game just the same.
I am just saying, Fallout was legendary. It was a very sad, dark day when we heard Fallout was leaving the hands of the original creators, and Van Buren would not come through. However, I did not even attempt to play Fallout 3 at first. But when I did, I didn't think it was that bad. It wasn't great, or near Fallout 1 status, but it wasn't bad. The way I look at Fallout 3 is that it is a spin-off. Not part of the actual series, however still canon.
The game wasn't bad. I liked the setting, the dark feel of a post-apocalypse, a feeling I hand not felt since Fallout 1. However, I still don't consider it part of the series. Maybe that is what helps me play the game without hating it. You can quickly and easily add on to your own posts by clicking the edit button.
SnapSlav , Jan 2, I liked it. It was the first Fallout I played and then I went back to play the others. It isn't as good as other games in the series, New Vegas is my personal favourite. Still there is more than one person on NMA so it isn't like there is just one opinion on the game.
Knight Captain Kerr , Jan 2, Because this is not Fallout game which is presented like Fallout. It's simple. Prosatanos , Jan 2, Makta , Jan 3, It is simply a bad game, imo. Even without the Fallout name it would have a stupid story, a non-sensical gameworld, and a horrible fucked up skill system.
Lexx , Jan 3, They play just enough of the game so they can get an opinion of it, this is never a good way to judge a games story. I can appreciate that, but it's a two way street.
A lot of old school Fallout fans treat those who prefer the new games like unrefined, brain-dead philistines whose opinions are irrelevant because their fandom isn't "true".
It's just as ridiculous. Xbox Live: JonTheArmadillo. They are old butthurt fans of the first games and think that Bethesda ruined 3.
They wanted Van Buren. Only thing I hate about F3 is losing hours of gameplay from a stupid bug or glitch. User Info: fadue. That and people get pissy when you change something that they not only love, but have been waiting forever for a sequel. Also I am I don't think I'd call myself old.
User Info: drakonianwolf Its like the first guy said. Lunitics of the first game that would sacrifise the original Devs to there god which are the origibals Devs but there logic says that someon is so Katty that even Katty cant be Katty. User Info: Kazandersand. No I don't understand you at all. Nothing about that was coherent. I once saw this show that this girl wanted to be Popular. Something happen that made it so she was popular but she became "TOO" Popular, that the hordes that worshipped her were gonna sacrifise her to the god that is her.
She wasnt Herself enough to BE herself. Thats what im getting at, they would sacrifise the original devs TOO the original devs to get a great game.
0コメント