They will claim the compact violates Amendment 3. Amendment 3 was a constitutional amendment passed in that requires voter approval of all proposed casino gambling expansion in the state. Anti-gambling campaigners will argue that the deal violates this amendment. Name, email and comment will be stored in our database. More Gambling the cure for all the states problems??? News Politics Share this:. Democrats opposing the deal have argued that the compact violates Amendment 3 passed by Florida voters in The amendment to the state constitution prevents the expansion of gambling outside of tribal lands without voter approval.
In , the U. Supreme Court struck down a federal law that barred states from authorizing sports betting. Those games, offered by many pari-mutuel facilities throughout the state, have been at the heart of a legal dispute between the state and the tribe. Pari-mutuel cardrooms, especially those outside of Miami-Dade and Broward counties that are not allowed to have slot machines, have grown to rely heavily on lucrative designated-player games as their major sources of revenue.
Pari-mutuels contend that thousands of jobs and tens of millions of dollars in revenue for the operators would be lost, were the games to go away. But that agreement expired in , prompting discussions about a new compact, which would have severely pared the designated player games. Under a settlement with former Gov.
In May, the Seminoles made good on threats and quit the long-standing revenue-sharing agreement with the state after the demise of a potential deal they had reached with Sen. Wilton Simpson , a Trilby Republican slated to take over as Senate president after the elections. Available On Air Stations. All Streams. State News. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email. Bjorn Bakstad. The News Service of Florida. See stories by The News Service of Florida.
Related Content.
0コメント